On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 1:21 PM Martin Ågren [off-list ref] wrote:
When we write `<name>`s with the "s" tucked on to the closing backtick,
we end up rendering the backticks literally. Rephrase this sentence
slightly to render this as monospace.
That seems fine, but one question (diff trimmed way down to
make it clearer I hope):
+ contain an equals sign to avoid ambiguity with <name> containing
+ to avoid ambiguity with `<name>` containing one.
One replacement drops the backquotes entirely. The other keeps
them. Surely these two shouldn't be *different*...?
Chris