Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs
flat view
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-27 04:20:44
On Tue, Jan 26 2021, Jonathan Tan wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+If the 'unborn' feature is advertised the following argument can be +included in the client's request. + + unborn + The server may send symrefs pointing to unborn branches in the form + "unborn <refname> symref-target:<target>". +
"branches" as in things under refs/heads/*? What should happen if you
send this for a refs/tags/* or refs/xyz/*? Maybe overly pedantic, but it
seems we have no other explicit mention of refs/{heads,tags}/ in
protocol-v2.txt before this[1].
1. Although as I've learned from another recent thread include-tag is
magical for refs/tags/* only.