Re: [PATCH v19 03/10] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook
From: Jiang Xin <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-21 05:26:41
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2020-11-05 · Re: [PATCH v19 03/10] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
SZEDER Gábor [off-list ref] 于2021年1月20日周三 下午8:29写道:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 04:24:11PM +0800, Jiang Xin wrote:quoted
SZEDER Gábor [off-list ref] 于2021年1月18日周一 上午6:21写道:quoted
This patch added a whole lot of test cases, and two of them '86 - proc-receive: not support push options (builtin protocol)' and '95 - proc-receive: not support push options (builtin protocol/porcelain)' are prone to rare failures. On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Jiang Xin wrote:quoted
diff --git a/t/t5411/test-0026-push-options.sh b/t/t5411/test-0026-push-options.sh new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d0c4da8b23 --- /dev/null +++ b/t/t5411/test-0026-push-options.shquoted
+# Refs of upstream : master(A) +# Refs of workbench: master(A) tags/v123 +# git push -o ... : refs/for/master/topic +test_expect_success "proc-receive: not support push options ($PROTOCOL)" ' + test_must_fail git -C workbench push \ + -o issue=123 \ + -o reviewer=user1 \ + origin \ + HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \ + >out 2>&1 &&Three relevant things are happening here: - 'git push' is executed with its standard output and error redirected to the file 'out'. - 'git push' executes 'git receive-pack' internally, which inherits the open file descriptors, so its output and error goes into that same 'out' file. - 'git push' is expected to fail when it finds out that the other side doesn't support push options, but it does so with a simple die() right away, without waiting for its child 'git receive-pack' process to finish.quoted
+ make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual && + test_i18ngrep "fatal: the receiving end does not support push options" \ + actual && + git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&Here the shell opens and truncates the file 'out' to write 'git show-ref's output, i.e. it is still the same 'out' file that was used earlier. Consequently, it is possible that 'git receive-pack' is still running, its open file descriptors to 'out' are still valid, and its "fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly" error message about the suddenly disappeared 'git push' can partially overwrite the output from 'git show-ref'.quoted
quoted
I think these are the only two tests that can cause this racy behavior: by instrumenting finish_command() I found that in all other tests where 'git push' is expected to fail it errors out gracefully and waits for its 'git receive-pack' child process.Atomic push may have the same problem.I don't think so, because send_pack() doesn't die() when a ref is rejected in an atomic push, but returns, and lets its caller terminate in an usual way, including waiting for 'git receive-pack'.
I find many places where the client side will die() before closing the
service side gracefully:
+ In `transport_push()`, if fail to push a submodule, will die().
+ In `git_transport_push()`, will die() for an unimplemented v2 protocol.
+ In `send_pack()`, will die() if
the server side has an incompatible hash algorithm, or
the receiving end does not support --signed push, or
the receiving end does not support --atomic push, or
the receiving end does not support push options