Re: [PATCH 1/1] builtin/pack-objects.c: avoid iterating all refs
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-20 19:54:56
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:50:19AM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
To elaborate on other things that aren't really your problem & Taylor's
E-Mail downthread we originally added this because:
If new annotated tags have been introduced then we can also include
them in the packfile, saving the client from needing to request them
through a second connection.
I've barked up this whole tag fetch tree before 97716d217c (fetch: add a
--prune-tags option and fetch.pruneTags config, 2018-02-09) but really
not this specific area.
I wonder if longer term simply moving this to be work the client does
wouldn't make more sense. I.e. if we just delete this for_each_ref()
loop.
We're just saving a client from saying they "want" a tag. I.e. with the
whole thing removed we need this to make t5503-tagfollow.sh pass (see
[1] at the end for the dialog, the tag is 3253df4d...):Isn't this an ordering problem, though? The client cannot mention auto-followed tags in a "want", because they first need to "want" the main history, receive the pack, and then realize they want the others. So we are not just saving the client from sending a "want", but making a second full connection to do so. That seems to be an optimization worth continuing to have. But here...
diff --git a/t/t5503-tagfollow.sh b/t/t5503-tagfollow.sh
index 6041a4dd32..1ddc430aef 100755
--- a/t/t5503-tagfollow.sh
+++ b/t/t5503-tagfollow.sh
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch B, S (commit and tag : 1 connection)' '
test_expect_success 'setup expect' '
cat - <<EOF >expect
want $B
+want $T
want $S
EOF
'
@@ -146,6 +147,7 @@ test_expect_success 'new clone fetch master and tags' '
cd clone2 &&
git init &&
git remote add origin .. &&
+ git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*" &&
GIT_TRACE_PACKET=$UPATH git fetch &&
test $B = $(git rev-parse --verify origin/master) &&
test $S = $(git rev-parse --verify tag2) &&
We're also saving the client the work of having to go through
refs/tags/* and figure out whether there are tags there that aren't on
our main history.You seem to be against auto-following at all. And certainly I can see an argument that it is not worth the trouble it causes. But it is the default behavior, and I suspect many people are relying on it. Fetching every tag indiscriminately is going to grab a bunch of extra unwanted objects in some repos. An obvious case is any time "clone --single-branch --depth" is used. Maybe I'm not quite understanding what you're proposing. -Peff