Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 5 authors, 2021-01-06

Re: [PATCH] doc: fix some typos

From: Martin Ågren <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-02 23:01:15

On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 at 23:26, Felipe Contreras
[off-list ref] wrote:
Martin Ågren wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 at 18:43, Thomas Ackermann via GitGitGadget
[off-list ref] wrote:

[Snip several typo fixes in Documentation/, all of which I agree with.]
quoted
diff --git a/contrib/buildsystems/CMakeLists.txt b/contrib/buildsystems/CMakeLists.txt
index c151dd7257f..8f77baa678f 100644
--- a/contrib/buildsystems/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/contrib/buildsystems/CMakeLists.txt
Hmm... This does not match the "doc:" prefix of the patch.
quoted
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ endif()
 check_c_source_compiles("
 #include <regex.h>
 #ifndef REG_STARTEND
-#error oops we dont have it
+#error oops we don't have it
 #endif
I don't think this is correct. This omission of the single quote somehow
looks like it's done on purpose. I don't build using this system, but I
tried making some silly code like this in another file, which I actually
do use:

#if 0
#error might or mightn't work
#endif
But this works:

#error "might or mightn't work"
Yeah, I pondered writing something like that. But then I thought I would
also need to write something about how, at the least, it should still be
a separate patch, but also how even if it were a separate patch, I would
probably sort it under code churn (IMVHO).

The error is not really intended for anyone's eyes, at least assuming my
reading is correct. So I refrained from suggesting to Thomas that here's
how you could go about making such a change.

And now I ended up laying out my thoughts anyway. :-) Of course, others
may well disagree with me about this being code churn.

Martin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help