Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2020-12-23

Re: [PATCH v4 06/20] mktag tests: improve verify_object() test coverage

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2020-12-23 02:05:41

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  [off-list ref] writes:
 cat >tag.sig <<EOF
 object $(test_oid deadbeef)
+type tag
+tag mytag
+tagger . <> 0 +0000
+
+EOF
+
+check_verify_failure 'verify object (hash/type) check -- correct type, nonexisting object' \
+	'^error: char7: could not verify object.*$'
+
OK.

+cat >tag.sig <<EOF
+object $head
 type tagggg
 tag mytag
 tagger . <> 0 +0000
 
 EOF
 
-check_verify_failure 'verify object (SHA1/type) check' \
+check_verify_failure 'verify object (hash/type) check -- made-up type, nonexisting object' \
+	'^fatal: invalid object type'
tagggg is "made-up type".  Where did we grab head from?  it is
head=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) at the very beginning.  Is that
really a nonexisting object?
+cat >tag.sig <<EOF
+object $(test_oid deadbeef)
+type tagggg
+tag mytag
+tagger . <> 0 +0000
+
+EOF
+
+check_verify_failure 'verify object (hash/type) check -- incorrect type, valid object' \
 	'^error: char7: could not verify object.*$'
This is the "made-up type, nonexisting object", and previous one is
"made-up type, valid object", no?
+cat >tag.sig <<EOF
+object $head
+type tree
+tag mytag
+tagger . <> 0 +0000
+
+EOF
+
+check_verify_failure 'verify object (hash/type) check -- incorrect type, valid object' \
+	'^error: char7: could not verify object'
And this is correct.  "type tree" is not a made-up type, and $head
is a valid object but it is not of "type tree".


Somehow I feel as if this patch is trying to see if reviewers are
paying attention to ;-)

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help