Re: [PATCH] submodules: fix of regression on fetching of non-init subsub-repo
From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2020-12-04 18:07:52
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:25 AM Peter Kaestle [off-list ref] wrote:
[...] Furthermore a regression test case is added, which tests for recursive fetches on a superproject with uninitialized sub repositories. This issue was leading to an infinite loop when doing a revert of a62387b.
Just a few small comments (nothing comprehensive) from a quick scan of the patch... Mostly they are just minor style issues, not necessarily worth a re-roll, but there is one actionable item.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Peter Kaestle <redacted> ---diff --git a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh@@ -719,4 +719,98 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch new submodule commit intermittently referenced by sup +add_commit_push () { + dir="$1" + msg="$2" + shift 2
We typically recommend including these assignments in the &&-chain to future-proof against someone later inserting code above them and not realizing that that code is not part of the &&-chain, in which case if the new code fails, the failure might go unnoticed.
+ git -C "$dir" add "$@" &&
+ git -C "$dir" commit -a -m "$msg" &&
+ git -C "$dir" push
+}
+
+compare_refs_in_dir () {
+ fail= &&
+ if test "x$1" = 'x!'
+ then
+ fail='!' &&
+ shift
+ fi &&
+ git -C "$1" rev-parse --verify "$2" >expect &&
+ git -C "$3" rev-parse --verify "$4" >actual &&
+ eval $fail test_cmp expect actual
+}We have a test_cmp_rev() similar to this but it doesn't support -C as some of our other test functions do. I briefly wondered if it would make sense to extend it to understand -C, but even that wouldn't help this case since compare_refs_in_dir() introduced here involves two distinct directories. The need here is so special-purpose that it likely would not make sense to upgrade test_cmp_rev() to accommodate it. Okay.
+test_expect_success 'setup nested submodule fetch test' '
+ # does not depend on any previous test setups
+
+ for repo in outer middle inner
+ do
+ (
+ git init --bare $repo &&
+ git clone $repo ${repo}_content &&
+ echo "$repo" >"${repo}_content/file" &&
+ add_commit_push ${repo}_content "initial" file
+ ) || return 1
+ done &&What is the purpose of the subshell here? Is it to ensure that commits in each repo have identical timestamps? Or is it just for making the && and || expression more clear? If the latter, we normally don't bother with the parentheses.
+ git clone outer A && + git -C A submodule add "$pwd/middle" && + git -C A/middle/ submodule add "$pwd/inner" && + add_commit_push A/middle/ "adding inner sub" .gitmodules inner && + add_commit_push A/ "adding middle sub" .gitmodules middle && + + git clone outer B && + git -C B/ submodule update --init middle && + + compare_refs_in_dir A HEAD B HEAD && + compare_refs_in_dir A/middle HEAD B/middle HEAD && + test -f B/file && + test -f B/middle/file && + ! test -f B/middle/inner/file &&
These days we typically use test_path_exists() (or test_path_is_file()) and test_path_is_missing() rather than bare `test`.
+test_expect_success 'setup recursive fetch with uninit submodule' ' + # does not depend on any previous test setups + + git init main && + git init sub && + + touch sub/file &&
Unless the timestamp of the file is significant to the test, in which
case `touch` is used, we normally create empty files like this:
>sub/file &&
+test_expect_success 'recursive fetch with uninit submodule' ' + git -C main submodule deinit -f sub && + ! git -C main fetch --recurse-submodules |& + grep -v -m1 "Fetching submodule sub$" &&
We want the test scripts to be portable, thus avoid Bashisms such as `|&`.
We also avoid placing a Git command upstream in a pipe since doing so
causes the exit code of the Git command to be lost. Instead, we would
normally send the Git output to a file and then send that file to
whatever would be downstream of the Git command in the pipe. So, a
mechanical rewrite of the above (without thinking too hard about it)
might be:
git -C main fetch --recurse-submodules >out 2>&1 &&
! grep -v -m1 "Fetching submodule sub$" &&
+ git -C main submodule status | + sed -e "s/^-//" -e "s/ sub$//" >actual &&
Same comment about avoiding Git upstream in a pipe, so perhaps:
git -C main submodule status >out &&
sed -e "s/^-//" -e "s/ sub$//" out >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual +'