Re: [PATCH v2] t5411: consistent result for proc-receive broken test

Jiang Xin [off-list ref] writes:

Thanks Peff for pointing the root cause. Will use the "gently" forms
of packet_write_fmt() and packet_flush() in patch v3.

Another thing I noticed.  Its tests are based on a codebase where
master is called main, which means it is not designed to be usable
with the 'master' or 'maint' track.  

Because the topic is no longer "just apply a band-aid to paper over
test flakeyness" but is fixing the codepath that matters in real
user experience, I'd prefer to see it applicable even to the
maintenance track.

Thanks.