Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 3 authors, 2020-10-26

Re: [PATCH 2/9] merge tests: expect improved directory/file conflict handling in ort

From: Elijah Newren <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-23 17:40:42

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 9:01 AM Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
[off-list ref] wrote:
From: Elijah Newren <redacted>

merge-recursive.c is built on the idea of running unpack_trees() and
then "doing minor touch-ups" to get the result.  Unfortunately,
unpack_trees() was run in an update-as-it-goes mode, leading
merge-recursive.c to follow suit and end up with an immediate evaluation
and fix-it-up-as-you-go design.  Some things like directory/file
conflicts are not well representable in the index data structure, and
required special extra code to handle.  But then when it was discovered
that rename/delete conflicts could also be involved in directory/file
conflicts, the special directory/file conflict handling code had to be
copied to the rename/delete codepath.  ...and then it had to be copied
for modify/delete, and for rename/rename(1to2) conflicts, ...and yet it
still missed some.  Further, when it was discovered that there were also
file/submodule conflicts and submodule/directory conflicts, we needed to
copy the special submodule handling code to all the special cases
throughout the codebase.

And then it was discovered that our handling of directory/file conflicts
was suboptimal because it would create untracked files to store the
contents of the conflicting file, which would not be cleaned up if
someone were to run a 'git merge --abort' or 'git rebase --abort'.  It
was also difficult or scary to try to add or remove the index entries
corresponding to these files given the directory/file conflict in the
index.  But changing merge-recursive.c to handle these correctly was a
royal pain because there were so many sites in the code with similar but
not identical code for handling directory/file/submodule conflicts that
would all need to be updated.

I have worked hard to push all directory/file/submodule conflict
handling in merge-ort through a single codepath, and avoid creating
untracked files for storing tracked content (it does record things at
alternate paths, but makes sure they have higher-order stages in the
index).

Since updating merge-recursive is too much work and we don't want to
destabilize it, instead update the testsuite to have different
expectations for relevant directory/file/submodule conflict tests.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <redacted>
Perhaps I should also mention that these changes to directory/file
conflict handling were discussed previously in the thread at
https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqbmabcuhf.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/ (local).
I just never got around to a complete implementation within
merge-recursive.c, but did implement it in merge-ort.c

I still haven't gotten around to fixing up git-mv and git-rm as
suggested by Junio in that thread; but at least I've finally gotten
the merge machinery side written...
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help