Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
- if (strcasecmp(iter.key.buf, log->trailer))
+ if (!string_list_has_string(&log->trailers, iter.key.buf))
continue;
...
quoted hunk
+ if (!log.groups)
+ log.groups = SHORTLOG_GROUP_AUTHOR;
+ string_list_sort(&log.trailers);
I initially reacted with "oh, why sort?" to this line, before
realizing that the list is used as a look-up table, which, if I
recall correctly, you said you want to see us move off of in the
longer term.
As we already have the string-set in this series, I am wondering
why we are not using it. It's not like the code at some point
needs to iterate over log.trailers in some stable order, right?
I do realize that going to hashmap might be overkill, but once we
have an easy-to-use wrapper around it, between one "table of
strings" API and another "table of strings" API, I do not see a
reason why we want to choose the string_list.
Thanks.