Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2020-08-24

Re: [PATCH] Avoid infinite loop in malformed packfiles

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-24 17:33:48

Ori Bernstein [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
diff --git a/packfile.c b/packfile.c
index 6ab5233613..321e002c50 100644
--- a/packfile.c
+++ b/packfile.c
@@ -1715,6 +1716,12 @@ void *unpack_entry(struct repository *r, struct packed_git *p, off_t obj_offset,
 			break;
 		}
 
+		if (delta_stack_nr > UNPACK_ENTRY_STACK_LIMIT) {
+			error("overlong delta chain at offset %jd from %s",
+			      (uintmax_t)curpos, p->pack_name);
The "j" length field is not used anywhere in the codebase for
portability concerns, I think.  "d" is for signed, but curpos
is an unsigned off_t.  I think

	"... %"PRIuMAX" from %s", (uintmax_t)curpos, ...

would match how we write this kind of thing everywhere else in the
code, e.g. showing obj_offset in packed_to_object_type() in the same
file in an error message.
quoted hunk
@@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ static void write_pack_access_log(struct packed_git *p, off_t obj_offset)
 
 int do_check_packed_object_crc;
 
+#define UNPACK_ENTRY_STACK_LIMIT 10000
 #define UNPACK_ENTRY_STACK_PREALLOC 64
 struct unpack_entry_stack_ent {
 	off_t obj_offset;
What escape hatch would the end-users have when they have a
legitimate packfile that has a truly deep delta chain, by the way?

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help