Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] negotiator/null: add null fetch negotiator

On 8/11/2020 6:52 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:

Add a null fetch negotiator. 

I understand the value of this negotiator. I'm concerned about using
"null" as the name, since it has a clear relationship to zero-valued
pointers and that's not what is happening. (My gut feeling starting the
patch was that some function pointers would be NULL or something.)

Instead, might I recommend "noop" or "no_op" in place of "null" here?

Thanks,
-Stolee