Re: [PATCH] refs: fix interleaving hook calls with reference-transaction hook

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:49:46AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:

quoted

Yeah, it's also been my take that OS-level overhead is probably going to
matter more than those access calls, and I argued such back when I
proposed the hook. So I'm perfectly happy to see this caching mechanism
go.

Should I re-post a v2 with your patch and my test?

Sure, that would be fine (to be clear, I'd also be OK with your original
patch, too; it was mostly just a curiosity to me).

Let's queue the correctness fix patch as-is. 

We can and should make the simplification as a separate step,
justified with the performance numbers.

Thanks.