Re: [PATCH 1/2] Modify pseudo refs through ref backend storage

Han-Wen Nienhuys [off-list ref] writes:

I can fix this specific instance here (which is what I think you
want), for this commit to practice what it preaches. At the same time
there are probably about 100 or so other places where the tests check
the file system directly for ref(log) existence, so it would never be
totally consistent.

The only way to systematically find the offending places is to
introduce a new ref backend and then fix all the tests, and I think
that goes outside the scope of this small series.

Good.  I think we are on the same page.  I suggested to make the
patch internally consistent, nothing more.  And fixing everything in
the world is outside the scope of these two patches.

Thanks.