On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 18:50:05 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
True, as Dscho also mentioned. I'll just do "b914084007" =>
"ee4512ed48 and b914084007" while queueing.
I noticed that I was missing a word in the message, and I'm sending a new
patch with a better commit message for the second commit, so I'll update this
in the first commit and send a new patchset.
quoted
A test would be nice, but I don't think it's very feasible for the same
reason mentioned in 46df6906f3.
Yeah, I don't think I have a good enough grasp of how to test this, and I saw
that there wasn't any existing tests for it, so that's why I dropped it.
--
Trygve Aaberge