Re: [PATCH 2/2] Wait for child on signal death for aliases to externals

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

Sorry that ended up so long-winded, but my conclusion is: this is doing
the right thing. We should probably embed some of that discussion in the
commit message, but I think the simplest argument is just: this is what
we do for external commands we run, so treating shell aliases the same
in terms of passing along signals makes things simple and consistent.

Thanks for a great analysis to help the author.