On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 06:38:43PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Git does not have slave branches and has never had. Independent
of any future change to the naming of branches, remove the sole
appearance of the term.
I think this is a sensible change, though note that something simpler
was proposed recently:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200610165441.iktvzuwz44sbytfg@chatter.i7.local/ (local)
and the review suggested using a name that is even more meaningful to
the test case (so we not just remove the unwanted names, but make the
test easier to follow).
-Peff