Re: Collaborative conflict resolution feature request

Philip Oakley [off-list ref] writes:

It could be effectively a special strategy. IIUC the '--' separator is
already supported by the underlying parser code, so may not be that
hard? (perhaps a local contribution to the codebase;-). Just a thought.

Assuming that there are paths A and B that would leave conflict in
an attempted merge between commits X and Y, you somehow resolve the
conflict in A and leave B unresolved, what would you pass to the
other person and ask to resolve the conflicts in B?  It cannot be a
merge commit that records X and Y as its parents and a single tree
object as the result, because the whole point of this is that you do
not even know what to record for B.

I think the most important and useful part of this is to design the
data format used for that task of passing from you to the other
person.  The way to specify which paths are yours etc. are much less
interesting and trivial part of the story, I would think.