Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2020-05-08

Re: "--quiet" for git-push does not suppress remote hook output

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2020-05-07 21:02:13

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:16:36PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 05/07/20 14:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
quoted
Hi,

being a total novice in git internals, it seems like
"builtin/receive-pack.c" (on the server) forwards any receive hook
output with copy_to_sideband() back to git-push (on the client), even if
git-push was invoked with "--quiet".

And "case 2" in demultiplex_sideband() seems to print that "band" to
stderr (on the client), despite "--quiet".

Is this intentional? I'd prefer "git push --quiet" to suppress remote
hook output (unless the remote hook fails).
I think the client has to propagate sideband 2 from the server, since it
doesn't know whether the messages are informational or errors (and even
with --quiet, we'd want to show errors).

There is a "quiet" protocol capability; when you run "git push --quiet"
on the client, it tells the server to use "quiet", and then it passes
options to index-pack, etc, to suppress progress. But that never makes
it to hooks.
Or else:

would it be the job of the particular receive hooks to observe and obey
the "--quiet" option in the GIT_PUSH_OPTION_* environment variables?
That would work, but push options require the client to send them. We
should probably be passing knowledge of the "quiet" capability from
receive-pack down to the hooks, probably via an environment variable
(but not GIT_PUSH_OPTION_*, because that already has meaning).

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help