Re: [PATCH 4/5] t6022, t6046: test expected behavior instead of testing a proxy for it
From: Elijah Newren <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-13 17:18:44
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 10:12 AM SZEDER Gábor [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:14:23AM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:quoted
diff --git a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh index 6f196aaf276..d97cf48495b 100755 --- a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh +++ b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh@@ -242,12 +242,23 @@ test_expect_success 'merge of identical changes in a renamed file' ' rm -f A M N && git reset --hard && git checkout change+rename && + + test-tool chmtime =31337 B && + test-tool chmtime --get B >old-mtime &&Here you compare the mtime of 'B' before ...quoted
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change >out && - test_i18ngrep "^Skipped B" out && + + test-tool chmtime --get B >new-mtime && + test_cmp old-mtime new-mtime &&... and after the merge.quoted
+ git reset --hard HEAD^ && git checkout change && + + test-tool chmtime =-1 M && + test-tool chmtime --get M >old-mtime &&Here, however, you compare the mtime of 'M' before the merge ...quoted
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change+rename >out && - test_i18ngrep ! "^Skipped B" out + + test-tool chmtime --get B >new-mtime && + test $(cat old-mtime) -lt $(cat new-mtime)... with the mtime of 'B' after the merge, i.e. the mtimes of two different files. Is that right?
No, sounds like a copy-and-paste-and-forget-to-update bug. Thanks for spotting it. Since you found it, do you want to submit a patch with the fix?