Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2020-02-29

Re: [PATCH] pull: warn if the user didn't say whether to rebase or to merge

flat view

From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2020-02-29 03:04:03

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:16:01PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
To
avoid that situation, Git should require users to explicitly specify
whether their primary workflow is a contributor/rebasing workflow or a
maintainer/merging workflow.
There is nothing Git "should" do.  There are things we wish Git did,
and we give orders to the codebase to do so in our proposed log
message.  Perhaps like:
I'd also note that there are some workflows that assume that --rebase
is *never* a good thing, even for contributors.  We can decide whether
we want to bias the git man page in favor of one workflow as opposed
to another, for the sake of new git users, but I don't think it's
accurate to say (or even imply) that there are only two workflows:
contributor/rebasing and maintainer/merging.

							- Ted
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help