Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2019-12-23

Re: Mismatch meaning between git-diff and git-log for the .. (double dot notation) and ... (triple dot notation)

From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-23 21:59:34

Kevin Daudt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 10:02:31AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Please unlearn dot-dot and three-dots when using "git diff", which
is not about ranges but about comparing two endpoints.  If we were
reinventing Git today from scratch, we would make "git diff A..B" an
error.  You can consider it a bug that the command accepts a range
notation, but this will not change any time soon without a large
fight to find and fix uses of the syntax in scripts by longtime Git
users have written over the years.
[...]
I agree that you should not use `A..B`, but what is wrong with
`A...B`? The alternative is a lot more verbose.

git diff $(git merge-base A B) B
Commands like "git checkout" have been learning a `...` shorthand
which is not much better as far as intuitiveness goes:

	# doesn't work, just here for demonstration
	git diff A...B B

With hindsight, "git diff A..B" would be the perfect spelling for
this, but that would break too many people's muscle memories and
scripts.  Would it make sense to have a commandline option for this?

	# doesn't work, just here for demonstration
	git diff --fork-point A B

A random thought,
Jonathan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help