Re: Mismatch meaning between git-diff and git-log for the .. (double dot notation) and ... (triple dot notation)
From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-23 21:59:34
From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-23 21:59:34
Kevin Daudt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 10:02:31AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Please unlearn dot-dot and three-dots when using "git diff", which is not about ranges but about comparing two endpoints. If we were reinventing Git today from scratch, we would make "git diff A..B" an error. You can consider it a bug that the command accepts a range notation, but this will not change any time soon without a large fight to find and fix uses of the syntax in scripts by longtime Git users have written over the years.
[...]
I agree that you should not use `A..B`, but what is wrong with `A...B`? The alternative is a lot more verbose. git diff $(git merge-base A B) B
Commands like "git checkout" have been learning a `...` shorthand which is not much better as far as intuitiveness goes: # doesn't work, just here for demonstration git diff A...B B With hindsight, "git diff A..B" would be the perfect spelling for this, but that would break too many people's muscle memories and scripts. Would it make sense to have a commandline option for this? # doesn't work, just here for demonstration git diff --fork-point A B A random thought, Jonathan