Re: Git Test Coverage Report (Mon. Dec 9)
flat view
From: Derrick Stolee <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-09 18:23:28
On 12/9/2019 1:10 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
Am 09.12.19 um 18:44 schrieb Derrick Stolee:quoted
On 12/9/2019 12:19 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:quoted
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 12:11 PM René Scharfe [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Am 09.12.19 um 16:36 schrieb Derrick Stolee:quoted
René Scharfe 0bb313a5 xdiff: unignore changes in function context xdiff/xemit.c 0bb313a5 223) xchp->i1 + xchp->chg1 <= s1 && 0bb313a5 224) xchp->i2 + xchp->chg2 <= s2) 0bb313a5 225) xchp = xchp->next;Hmm, line 223 *is* exercised by t4015.85.This, along with Dscho's[1] review of an earlier coverage report, makes one wonder if there is some off-by-one error in the reporting logic, such that it is reporting the wrong lines as not covered.This is definitely possible. I'll see if I can locate the bug in my report-generation code. However, line 222 is here [1] while (xchp != xch && So if this is always false, then the rest of the while condition will not be tested, nor will the body (line 225: xchp = xchp->next;).0bb313a5 also added lines 228 and 229, which are not in the report, so xchp != xch must be true at least once (it is, in t4015.85). 222) while (xchp != xch && 223) xchp->i1 + xchp->chg1 <= s1 && 224) xchp->i2 + xchp->chg2 <= s2) 225) xchp = xchp->next; 226) 227) /* If so, show it after all. */ 228) if (xchp != xch) { 229) xch = xchp;
Thanks for pointing out that context. My guess is that gcov is marking the line as uncovered because the && operator is on that line. I'm testing [1] by breaking style conventions and using the following: while (xchp != xch && xchp->i1 + xchp->chg1 <= s1 && xchp->i2 + xchp->chg2 <= s2) xchp = xchp->next; [1] https://dev.azure.com/git/git/_build/results?buildId=1453