Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2019-12-06

Re: es/pathspec-f-f-grep, was Re: am/pathspec-f-f-checkout

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-06 16:27:36

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
Oops, I was talking about `es/pathspec-f-f-grep`, not about
`am/pathspec-f-f-checkout`, sorry for the mixup.
Thanks.  Yup, these uninitialized variables give a sign of
carelessness.  Will put on hold.
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
Hi Junio & Emily,

On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
* am/pathspec-f-f-checkout (2019-12-04) 7 commits
 - checkout, restore: support the --pathspec-from-file option
 - doc: restore: synchronize <pathspec> description
 - doc: checkout: synchronize <pathspec> description
 - doc: checkout: fix broken text reference
 - doc: checkout: remove duplicate synopsis
 - add: support the --pathspec-from-file option
 - cmd_add: prepare for next patch
 (this branch uses am/pathspec-from-file; is tangled with es/pathspec-f-f-grep.)

 A few more commands learned the "--pathspec-from-file" command line
 option.

 Will merge to 'next'.
Gábor noticed that this breaks Travis, and I provided a patch that
initializes those new variables. Please squash that in before merging to
`next`.

Thanks,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help