Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2019-11-30

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mingw: spawned processes need to inherit only standard handles

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2019-11-29 13:52:53

Hi Hannes,

On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Johannes Sixt wrote:
I'm sorry for being a bit slow lately. I found time to test this patch
only today.
Out of curiosity: did you apply the patch on `master`, or on anything
different?

I ask because...
Am 22.11.19 um 15:41 schrieb Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget:
quoted
From: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>

By default, CreateProcess() does not inherit any open file handles,
unless the bInheritHandles parameter is set to TRUE. Which we do need to
set because we need to pass in stdin/stdout/stderr to talk to the child
processes. Sadly, this means that all file handles (unless marked via
O_NOINHERIT) are inherited.

This lead to problems in VFS for Git, where a long-running read-object
hook is used to hydrate missing objects, and depending on the
circumstances, might only be called *after* Git opened a file handle.

Ideally, we would not open files without O_NOINHERIT unless *really*
necessary (i.e. when we want to pass the opened file handle as standard
handle into a child process), but apparently it is all-too-easy to
introduce incorrect open() calls: this happened, and prevented updating
a file after the read-object hook was started because the hook still
held a handle on said file.

Happily, there is a solution: as described in the "Old New Thing"
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20111216-00/?p=8873 there
is a way, starting with Windows Vista, that lets us define precisely
which handles should be inherited by the child process.

And since we bumped the minimum Windows version for use with Git for
Windows to Vista with v2.10.1 (i.e. a *long* time ago), we can use this
method. So let's do exactly that.

We need to make sure that the list of handles to inherit does not
contain duplicates; Otherwise CreateProcessW() would fail with
ERROR_INVALID_ARGUMENT.

While at it, stop setting errno to ENOENT unless it really is the
correct value.
I think the new code does not do that correctly. I observe a failure in
test #2 in t0061, which is this one:

test_expect_success 'start_command reports ENOENT (slash)' '
	test-tool run-command start-command-ENOENT ./does-not-exist 2>err &&
	test_i18ngrep "\./does-not-exist" err
'

It does not even get to test_i18ngrep (test-tool fails), and err
contains this:

error: cannot spawn ./does-not-exist: Result too large
FAIL start-command-ENOENT

That "Result too large" is ERANGE.

Don't you observe that, too? (I'm testing on Windows 10, BTW.)
No, I don't observe that. And neither does the CI build:
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/runs/317137275

This CI build tested the `js/mingw-inherit-only-std-handles` branch that
is mirrored into gitgitgadget/git from https://github.com/gitster/git.

Could you try with that branch, to see whether it "magically" fixes the
issue you are seeing?
I've done a bit of tracing, see below.
Much appreciated.
quoted
Also, fall back to not limiting handle inheritance under certain error
conditions (e.g. on Windows 7, which is a lot stricter in what handles
you can specify to limit to).

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
---
 compat/mingw.c         | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 t/t0061-run-command.sh |   2 +-
 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compat/mingw.c b/compat/mingw.c
index fe609239dd..cac18cc3da 100644
--- a/compat/mingw.c
+++ b/compat/mingw.c
@@ -1398,8 +1398,13 @@ static pid_t mingw_spawnve_fd(const char *cmd, const char **argv, char **deltaen
 			      const char *dir,
 			      int prepend_cmd, int fhin, int fhout, int fherr)
 {
-	STARTUPINFOW si;
+	static int restrict_handle_inheritance = 1;
+	STARTUPINFOEXW si;
 	PROCESS_INFORMATION pi;
+	LPPROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_LIST attr_list = NULL;
+	HANDLE stdhandles[3];
+	DWORD stdhandles_count = 0;
+	SIZE_T size;
 	struct strbuf args;
 	wchar_t wcmd[MAX_PATH], wdir[MAX_PATH], *wargs, *wenvblk = NULL;
 	unsigned flags = CREATE_UNICODE_ENVIRONMENT;
@@ -1435,11 +1440,23 @@ static pid_t mingw_spawnve_fd(const char *cmd, const char **argv, char **deltaen
 		CloseHandle(cons);
 	}
 	memset(&si, 0, sizeof(si));
-	si.cb = sizeof(si);
-	si.dwFlags = STARTF_USESTDHANDLES;
-	si.hStdInput = winansi_get_osfhandle(fhin);
-	si.hStdOutput = winansi_get_osfhandle(fhout);
-	si.hStdError = winansi_get_osfhandle(fherr);
+	si.StartupInfo.cb = sizeof(si);
+	si.StartupInfo.hStdInput = winansi_get_osfhandle(fhin);
+	si.StartupInfo.hStdOutput = winansi_get_osfhandle(fhout);
+	si.StartupInfo.hStdError = winansi_get_osfhandle(fherr);
+
+	/* The list of handles cannot contain duplicates */
+	if (si.StartupInfo.hStdInput != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
+		stdhandles[stdhandles_count++] = si.StartupInfo.hStdInput;
+	if (si.StartupInfo.hStdOutput != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE &&
+	    si.StartupInfo.hStdOutput != si.StartupInfo.hStdInput)
+		stdhandles[stdhandles_count++] = si.StartupInfo.hStdOutput;
+	if (si.StartupInfo.hStdError != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE &&
+	    si.StartupInfo.hStdError != si.StartupInfo.hStdInput &&
+	    si.StartupInfo.hStdError != si.StartupInfo.hStdOutput)
+		stdhandles[stdhandles_count++] = si.StartupInfo.hStdError;
+	if (stdhandles_count)
+		si.StartupInfo.dwFlags |= STARTF_USESTDHANDLES;

 	if (*argv && !strcmp(cmd, *argv))
 		wcmd[0] = L'\0';
@@ -1472,16 +1489,97 @@ static pid_t mingw_spawnve_fd(const char *cmd, const char **argv, char **deltaen
 	wenvblk = make_environment_block(deltaenv);

 	memset(&pi, 0, sizeof(pi));
-	ret = CreateProcessW(*wcmd ? wcmd : NULL, wargs, NULL, NULL, TRUE,
-		flags, wenvblk, dir ? wdir : NULL, &si, &pi);
+	if (restrict_handle_inheritance && stdhandles_count &&
+	    (InitializeProcThreadAttributeList(NULL, 1, 0, &size) ||
+	     GetLastError() == ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER) &&
+	    (attr_list = (LPPROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_LIST)
+			(HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, size))) &&
+	    InitializeProcThreadAttributeList(attr_list, 1, 0, &size) &&
+	    UpdateProcThreadAttribute(attr_list, 0,
+				      PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_HANDLE_LIST,
+				      stdhandles,
+				      stdhandles_count * sizeof(HANDLE),
+				      NULL, NULL)) {
+		si.lpAttributeList = attr_list;
+		flags |= EXTENDED_STARTUPINFO_PRESENT;
+	}
+
+	ret = CreateProcessW(*wcmd ? wcmd : NULL, wargs, NULL, NULL,
+			     stdhandles_count ? TRUE : FALSE,
+			     flags, wenvblk, dir ? wdir : NULL,
+			     &si.StartupInfo, &pi);
+
+	/*
+	 * On Windows 2008 R2, it seems that specifying certain types of handles
+	 * (such as FILE_TYPE_CHAR or FILE_TYPE_PIPE) will always produce an
+	 * error. Rather than playing finicky and fragile games, let's just try
+	 * to detect this situation and simply try again without restricting any
+	 * handle inheritance. This is still better than failing to create
+	 * processes.
+	 */
+	if (!ret && restrict_handle_inheritance && stdhandles_count) {
+		DWORD err = GetLastError();
CreateProcessW failed, so we arrive here. At this point, err is 2
(ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) as expected.
quoted
+		struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
+
+		if (err != ERROR_NO_SYSTEM_RESOURCES &&
Then this is true, ...
quoted
+		    /*
+		     * On Windows 7 and earlier, handles on pipes and character
+		     * devices are inherited automatically, and cannot be
+		     * specified in the thread handle list. Rather than trying
+		     * to catch each and every corner case (and running the
+		     * chance of *still* forgetting a few), let's just fall
+		     * back to creating the process without trying to limit the
+		     * handle inheritance.
+		     */
+		    !(err == ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER &&
+		      GetVersion() >> 16 < 9200) &&
... the bracketed expression is false, but it's negated, so it's true
again, ...
quoted
+		    !getenv("SUPPRESS_HANDLE_INHERITANCE_WARNING")) {
... and the variable isn't set, so we continue here. (But I don't think
it is important.)
quoted
+			DWORD fl = 0;
+			int i;
+
+			setenv("SUPPRESS_HANDLE_INHERITANCE_WARNING", "1", 1);
+
+			for (i = 0; i < stdhandles_count; i++) {
+				HANDLE h = stdhandles[i];
+				strbuf_addf(&buf, "handle #%d: %p (type %lx, "
+					    "handle info (%d) %lx\n", i, h,
+					    GetFileType(h),
+					    GetHandleInformation(h, &fl),
+					    fl);
+			}
+			strbuf_addstr(&buf, "\nThis is a bug; please report it "
+				      "at\nhttps://github.com/git-for-windows/"
+				      "git/issues/new\n\n"
+				      "To suppress this warning, please set "
+				      "the environment variable\n\n"
+				      "\tSUPPRESS_HANDLE_INHERITANCE_WARNING=1"
+				      "\n");
+		}
+		restrict_handle_inheritance = 0;
+		flags &= ~EXTENDED_STARTUPINFO_PRESENT;
+		ret = CreateProcessW(*wcmd ? wcmd : NULL, wargs, NULL, NULL,
+				     TRUE, flags, wenvblk, dir ? wdir : NULL,
+				     &si.StartupInfo, &pi);
Then this one fails again (with GetLastError() == 2, too, as expected).
quoted
+		if (ret && buf.len) {
+			errno = err_win_to_posix(GetLastError());
+			warning("failed to restrict file handles (%ld)\n\n%s",
+				err, buf.buf);
+		}
+		strbuf_release(&buf);
+	} else if (!ret)
+		errno = err_win_to_posix(GetLastError());
+
+	if (si.lpAttributeList)
+		DeleteProcThreadAttributeList(si.lpAttributeList);
+	if (attr_list)
+		HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, attr_list);

 	free(wenvblk);
 	free(wargs);

-	if (!ret) {
-		errno = ENOENT;
+	if (!ret)
 		return -1;
And then we take this error exist. At this point, GetLastError() == 0
(probably from the successful cleanup functions), but errno == 34
(ERANGE), probably a fallout from one of the xutftowcs that we do
earlier (I didn't check). The point is, we leave the function with a
failure indication, but without having set errno.

Any ideas?
Strange. When I debug this, errno is indeed still set from before, but to
ENOENT.

I wonder how you get that ERANGE when I get an ENOENT (and so do all the
CI/PR builds that did not catch this).

Will send a fix shortly.

Thanks,
Dscho
And why don't you observe the failure? A coincidence?
quoted
-	}
+
 	CloseHandle(pi.hThread);

 	/*
diff --git a/t/t0061-run-command.sh b/t/t0061-run-command.sh
index 473a3405ef..7d599675e3 100755
--- a/t/t0061-run-command.sh
+++ b/t/t0061-run-command.sh
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ cat >hello-script <<-EOF
 	cat hello-script
 EOF

-test_expect_failure MINGW 'subprocess inherits only std handles' '
+test_expect_success MINGW 'subprocess inherits only std handles' '
 	test-tool run-command inherited-handle
 '
-- Hannes
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help