Re: GitGitGadget on git/git, was Re: Should we auto-close PRs on git/git?
From: Eric Wong <hidden>
Date: 2019-11-27 02:37:47
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Eric Wong [off-list ref] writes:quoted
(and I'm not going to pay extortionist .org fees to keep public-inbox.org when it comes up for renewal in 2023, maybe everyone can use Tor .onions by then :> )Just on this tangent. Would you be willing to keep the domain and keep the service running, if Git Project Leadership Committee pays the fee out of the funds we keep at Software Freedom Conservancy?
Maybe... I'm against the *principle* of paying extortionists; and I don't think the Git project should encourage them, either. Promoting + developing a Distributed Hash Table (DHT) for Message-ID (and git OID) lookups to fight against centralization would be a better use of time and funds :> However, if EFF and other .orgs prove effective in keeping prices reasonable then that's fine, I guess. I personally expect to be financially worse off in 2023 than I was in 2013 when I bought the domain, so some help there could be nice :) The actual cost of running a service is only $20/month in VPS hosting. It's a business expense at the moment as I hack on that machine for clients, and I'm trying to make public-inbox cheaper and easier to host, too. But, https://lore.kernel.org/git/ has professionals behind it and is more scalable. It's currently missing syntax highlighting and blob regeneration because that's a PITA to configure, though...