Re: Should we auto-close PRs on git/git?
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2019-11-14 07:41:19
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 01:04:35PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
We talked a while ago about having GitGitGadget operate on git/git, rather than on a separate mirror. That would automatically help at least one class of PR-opener: people who want their patches to reach the list but didn't realize they should be using gitgitgadget/git. I don't remember what the technical blockers are for getting that set up, but it seems like a strictly nicer outcome than auto-closing their PR.Okay, here are a couple of technical challenges, off the top of my head: [...] Not an easy, nor a small project, I am afraid.
Yow. That's a lot more involved than I was hoping for. Thanks for writing it up. Some of the points raised were interesting. I do think we'd want git/git (the repository) to remain read-only if possible. If GitHub's permissions model is a limiting factor here, let me know and I can try to bring it to the attention of the right people. -Peff