Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] bundle-create: progress output control

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 07:28:55AM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote:

quoted

quoted

Do we need all four of these?

I copied the exact set of messages from git-pack-objects, and I do think
the same set makes sense specifically to mirror pack-objects for the
moment.

I'm not sure I agree. In what situation would anybody use "git bundle
create --all-progress-implied", for example? Literally no other Git
command except pack-objects has "--all-progress" or
"--all-progress-implied" (even ones which call pack-objects under the
hood to print the progress!), and the presence of the latter in
pack-objects is due to a backwards-compatibility thing in the early days
(where --all-progress did too many things, but we could no longer change
it). I think it would be a mistake to spread it further.

I am quite cure I agree with your reasoning that we would want to
limit the "--all-progress-implied" craziness from spreading ;-)

Thanks.