Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 5 authors, 2019-11-01

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vreportf(): avoid relying on stdio buffering

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-31 06:24:56

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:54:52AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
One non-bikeshed question: would fprintf() on some platforms have sent
"\r\n", which is no longer happening with our write()? Do we need to
care about that?
I am not aware of any platform where `fprintf()` would automatically
transform `\n` to `\r\n`. Not unless the `FILE *` in question has been
opened with the `t` flag. And I am rather certain that `stderr` is not
opened with that flag. And if it was, I would force it off in Git for
Windows.
OK, thanks. You guessed the platform I was thinking of. :)

Another more far-fetched one: IIRC our stdio wrappers on Windows do some
magic to convert ANSI color codes into actual terminal codes. Could that
be a problem here? I think we'd kill off any color codes in the actual
message due to the control-code replacement. In theory the prefix could
have them. I don't think any code does now, but the PUSH_COLOR_ERROR
stuff in builtin/push.c is getting close. I wouldn't be surprised for
that to eventually get folded into error().

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help