Hi Gábor,

On Fri, 18 Oct 2019, SZEDER Gábor wrote:

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:47:33PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:

quoted

From: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>

The CI builds are failing for Mac OS X due to a change in the

s/CI/Azure Pipelines/

Our Travis CI builds are fine.

For the moment ;-)

quoted

location of the perforce cask. The command outputs the following
error:

    + brew install caskroom/cask/perforce
    Error: caskroom/cask was moved. Tap homebrew/cask-cask instead.

So let's try to call `brew cask install perforce` first (which is what
that error message suggests, in a most round-about way).

The "caskroom" way was added in 672f51cb (travis-ci:
fix Perforce install on macOS, 2017-01-22) and the justification
is that the call "brew cask install perforce" can fail due to a checksum
mismatch: the recipe simply downloads the official Perforce distro, and
whenever that is updated, the recipe needs to be updated, too.

This paragraph is wrong, it mixes up things too much.

Prior to 672f51cb we used to install the 'perforce' _package_ with
'brew install perforce' (note: no 'cask' in there).  The justification
for 672f51cb was that the command 'brew install perforce' simply
stopped working, after Homebrew folks decided that it's better to move
the 'perforce' package to a "cask".  It was _their_ justification for
this move that 'brew install perforce' "can fail due to a checksum
mismatch ...", and casks can be installed without checksum
verification.  And indeed, both 'brew cask install perforce' and 'brew
install caskroom/cask/perforce' printed something along the lines of:

  ==> No checksum defined for Cask perforce, skipping verification

It's unclear to me why 672f51cb used 'brew install
caskroom/cask/perforce' instead of 'brew cask install perforce'.  It
appears (by running both commands on old Travis CI macOS images) that
both commands worked all the same already back then.

Anyway, as the error message at the top of the log message shows,
'brew install caskroom/cask/perforce' has stopped working recently,
but 'brew cask install perforce' still does, so let's use that.

If you don't mind, I am going to copy/edit these three paragraphs into
the commit message,

Note that on Travis CI we explicitly specify which macOS image to use,
and nowadays we don't run 'brew update' during the build process [1],
so both commands work in our builds there.

[1] f2f4715033 (ci: don't update Homebrew, 2019-07-03)

quoted

CI servers are typically fresh virtual machines, but not always. To
accommodate for that, let's try harder if `brew cask install perforce`
fails, by specifically pulling the latest `master` of the
`homebrew-cask` repository.

Homebrew didn't record a checksum for Perforce versions r17.1, r17.2
and r18.1, so installing those still works fine.  Our Travis CI images
install r18.1.

However, when Homebrew updated to Perforce r19.1, they included the
checksum again for some reason (intentional or accidental; I didn't
look why).  This worked fine for a while, until a couple of days ago
Perforce updated the r19.1 binaries in place, breaking those
checksums.

If we were to still run 'brew update', then it would shortly fix the
checksum mismatch.  But we don't run it, and we do not want to run it
because it takes ages.  Falling back to pull from the 'homebrew-cask'
repository could be a reasonable and quick workaround.

Okay, good.

quoted

This will still fail, of course, when `homebrew-cask` falls behind
Perforce's release schedule. But once it is updated, we can now simply
re-run the failed jobs and they will pick up that update.

In our CI builds we don't at all care what the checksums of the
Perforce binaries are, so I would really like to tell 'brew' to ignore
any checksum mismatch when installing 'perforce'.  Alas, it appears
that 'brew' has no public options to turn of or to ignore checksum
verification.

Sad, yet true, that we indeed have no command-line option to say "you
know what, your checksum possibly mismatches, but we really don't care".

Now, let's take a step back.

All 'brew cask install perforce' really does is run 'curl' to download
a tar.gz from the Perforce servers, verify its checksum, unpack it,
and put the executables somewhere on $PATH.  That's not rocket
science, we could easily do that ourselves; we don't even have to deal
with a tar.gz, the 'p4' and 'p4d' binaries for mac are readily
available for download at:

  http://filehost.perforce.com/perforce/r19.1/bin.macosx1010x86_64/

And, in fact, that's what we have been doing in some of our Linux jobs
since the very beginning, so basically only the download URL has to be
adjusted.

I'd rather not.

Just because there is no better way on Linux, and just because the
current `perforce` cask recipe happens to just download and unpack that
file does not mean that this won't change.

And if it changes, we will be a lot better off by using the provided
package.

As I wrote here:

quoted

As for updating `homebrew-cask`: the beginnings of automating this in
https://dev.azure.com/gitgitgadget/git/_build?definitionId=11&_a=summary
will be finished once the next Perforce upgrade comes around.

I am quite willing to do my share to keep the Homebrew recipe for
`perforce` up to date. We'll all be better off that way.

Ciao,
Dscho

quoted

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <redacted>
---
 ci/install-dependencies.sh | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/ci/install-dependencies.sh b/ci/install-dependencies.sh
index 85a9d6b15c..ce149ed39c 100755
--- a/ci/install-dependencies.sh
+++ b/ci/install-dependencies.sh

@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ osx-clang|osx-gcc)
 	test -z "$BREW_INSTALL_PACKAGES" ||
 	brew install $BREW_INSTALL_PACKAGES
 	brew link --force gettext
+	brew cask install perforce || {
+		# Update the definitions and try again
+		git -C "$(brew --repository)"/Library/Taps/homebrew/homebrew-cask pull &&
+		brew cask install perforce
+	} ||
 	brew install caskroom/cask/perforce
 	case "$jobname" in
 	osx-gcc)
--

gitgitgadget