Thread (13 messages) flat view 13 messages, 6 authors, 2019-09-16

Re: Git Gui - enhancement suggestion - Can a double click on the file name in the “unstaged” area move the item to “staged changes”

From: Pratyush Yadav <hidden>
Date: 2019-09-16 17:49:58

On 15/09/19 01:41PM, David wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 at 05:08, Pratyush Yadav [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 15/09/19 02:07AM, David wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 06:51, Bert Wesarg [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
I consider adding a second way as not not acceptable. I also consider
double-click on a file in a GUI an "open" action.
Yes!

In fact, I've often fantasized how useful it would be that if I double
clicked on that file name in the unstaged pane or the staged pane,
then that would open the file for editing in my preferred/configured editor.

Now for me *that* would be a very frequently used improvement!

I wonder what other readers think about this idea?
Sounds reasonable. I've wanted something similar, but for commit
messages.

But one major reason I didn't come up with a patch for editing commit
messages in the editor of your choice is terminal based editors.
Hi again Pratyush Yadav, and other readers!

I hope I don't sound like I am arguing or enthusiastically promoting change
in this subthread. I'm not, my attitude is rather just to explore an idea to see
what others think of it. Some days I have good ideas, other days my ideas
have flaws that I missed, so I like to discuss first.

More important, I want to say that I am very happy to see that there are
folks interested to discuss the Tcl/Tk git GUI tools. In fact I have local Tcl
patches myself, bugfixes and enhancements for git-gui and gitk, which I
would be happy to share except that I do not know how to do that effectively.

I don't enjoy Tcl and because of that I have avoided it and don't consider
my skill level to be very high. I find it rather obtuse, especially the way
it does namespacing, and "upvar" in particular. I struggle to read it without
comments. But I learned enough of Tcl specifically to improve aspects
of git-gui and gitk that were bothering me in the past.
I have quite the opposite experience with Tcl. I've been a C person for 
a long time, and was never a big fan of scripting languages. But I have 
been enjoying hacking in Tcl. But I do agree that some parts of Tcl are 
rather strange, and not easy for readability.

I'd be happy to look at your enhancements, and try to fine tune the 
code, but I would point out that some things might just be too specific 
to your workflow, and won't work for the rest of the people using 
git-gui. So do take that into account if you do decide to send some 
improvements in.
 
As well as bug fixes, I have enhancements to both that greatly assist
my workflow. For example, in git-gui, I have a hotkey that pastes the
currently highlighted pathname into the commit message. In gitk,
I have added "find all files in commit" to the file list pane, and fixed
the flawed regex matching and associated controls.
FYI, I'm not the maintainer of gitk. So patches for it should be sent to 
Paul Mackerras [off-list ref].
 
My workflow involves a lot of large rebases, and merge conflicts can occur
in the middle of them that affect dozens of files, that need editing
to resolve. That's where easily being able to start an editor from git-gui
in that situation would benefit my workflow. But, it's not a big deal.

Now, to specific comments you made:
quoted
I don't
think there is any way of finding out the default terminal emulator in
Linux, and I don't think there is a standard way of making terminal
emulator launch programs you want.
I agree where you say there is no "standard way", because the
various GUI environments are not consistent (Gnome, LXDE, etc) and
neither are the command line arguments of various terminal emulators,
and sometimes those don't work as expected.
quoted
So your suggestion works only for GUI based editors. We would have to
mention that only GUI based editors can open files.
Here, I disagree. My suggestion was to provide a double-click facility
that would trigger a command that can be *configured by the user*.

And it is wrong to say that only GUI editors can open files.
For example, my OS is Debian, my GUI is LXDE, and my terminal
emulator is lxterminal. (I don't recommend it, but that's another story).
If I have a terminal window open, I can type the command:
  $ lxterminal -e vi foo
Ah! I have used this many times (for gnome-terminal), but for some 
reason it didn't occur to me to have a customizable editor command. 
FWIW, I am in favor of something like this being used in git-gui.
and a new independent terminal window opens with the editor 'vi'
editing the file foo. Similar functionality can be achieved from a
.desktop file, or from a shell script.

Here is a demo Tcl script (working here) that confirms one way
of spawning an editor from Tcl in a terminal window under LXDE:

##### begin script #####
#!/usr/bin/tclsh

package require Tk

# name of this script
set scriptname [info script]

# demo user command
set command "lxterminal -e vi -R $scriptname"

# create text widget
pack [text .t]

# add text to show that we are running
.t insert end "$scriptname: Running: $command\n"

# run the demo command
set chan [open "| $command"]

# (at this point, a new terminal window appears
# containing vi displaying this script file)

# add text to show that we did not block on command
.t insert end "$scriptname: Reached end\n"

##### end script #####
If you would volunteer to send patches implementing something like that, 
I would be happy to review. As for me doing it myself, I can't really 
say if or when I can get to it. I have limited time available, and there 
are some other things I'd rather do first.

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help