Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2019-09-03

Re: [PATCH 1/1] rebase -r: let `label` generate safer labels

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2019-09-03 19:51:10

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
If you care deeply about double dashes and leading dashes, how about
this instead?

		char *from, *to;

   		for (from = to = label.buf; *from; from++)
			if ((*from & 0x80) || isalnum(*from))
				*(to++) = *from;
			/* avoid leading dash and double-dashes */
			else if (to != label.buf && to[-1] != '-')
   				*(to++) = '-';
		strbuf_setlen(&label, to - label.buf);
Simple enough and is a good change when judged locally.

It still would cause readers to wonder if label_oid() later append
'-%d' to end up with double-dash near the end, etc., which made me
wonder if the resulting code becomes better if sanitization and
uniquefying are done at the same single place in the other message.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help