Re: [PATCH 2/3] Doc: add more detail for git-format-patch

Denton Liu [off-list ref] writes:

Next, while we're at it, surround option arguments with <>.
...
 		   [--start-number <n>] [--numbered-files]
-		   [--in-reply-to=Message-Id] [--suffix=.<sfx>]
+		   [--in-reply-to=<Message-Id>] [--suffix=.<sfx>]
 		   [--ignore-if-in-upstream]
-		   [--rfc] [--subject-prefix=Subject-Prefix]
+		   [--rfc] [--subject-prefix=<Subject-Prefix>]
...
---in-reply-to=Message-Id::
+--in-reply-to=<Message-Id>::

That is a good change, but if we are making this change while are at
it, I think we should fix it to read <message id>.  "Message-Id" is
a good spelling iff we are talking about the label on the left hand
side of colon in e-mail header, but in this context, we are talking
about the value to be placed on that header.

All the other multi-word placeholders in the SYNOPSIS section spell
the words as normal multiple words separated with whitespace in
lower case.  You'd also want to fix the spelling of Subject-Prefix
to <subject prefix> for consistency.

Thanks.