Re: [PATCH 1/1] Let rebase.reschedulefailedexec only affect interactive rebases

Hi,

On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Vas Sudanagunta wrote:

It seems unintuitive that including a command to execute between each
rebase merge implies an interactive rebase. It’s no more interactive
than a sequence of rebase merges without intervening commands. A command
failure interrupts a rebase just as a merge conflict does. If the fact
that a rebase can be interrupts mid-sequence, then all rebases are
interactive.

Indeed. I would consider it an implementation detail that the `--exec`
option uses the interactive rebase backend, and I would hate to force
users to know about this.

Ciao,
Johannes