Re: 'git stash list' => Segmentation fault
From: Brendan Boerner <hidden>
Date: 2019-05-28 20:54:04
Hey Jeff, Lot of good tips for debugging for me to work on - I'll work on that. Both to avoid spamming the list and if sending large files e.g. strace is it ok if I continue correspondence with you directly? (And Johannes?) Thanks! Brendan On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 3:40 PM Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:56:13PM -0500, Brendan Boerner wrote:quoted
Unfortunately not a lot in the stack trace. [...] (gdb) bt #0 0x00007fd321805fdf in ?? () #1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()I'll say. :) I'd suspect either: 1. Your git isn't built with debugging symbols. Is it possible to build from source? The default CFLAGS if you just run "make" should be enough, then you can run it straight out of the build directory as "$YOUR_BUILD_DIR/bin-wrappers/git". 2. It's not the main git binary that's segfaulting. Most commands are built-ins of that binary these days, but a few are not. We should be able to figure out which command is having a problem from the trace output, but...quoted
14:52:22.633448 run-command.c:643 trace: run_command: git-stash list Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped)I'd have expected to see more sub-commands here. And it's weird that there are _three_ segfaults. Which version of Git is this? In the upcoming release stash is written in C, but from the trace output it looks like this is the old shell-script version (which is what I was assuming, but I just want to double check). Is it possible that your shell is segfaulting? Does "gdb /bin/sh core" reveal anything more useful (a long shot, I know; it probably doesn't have symbols either)?quoted
Do you need the whole repo or would bits of it suffice e.g. index?Probably the whole thing. "stash list" wouldn't generally look at the index at all. It should just be doing a "git log" on the reflog entries found in .git/logs/refs/stash. But...quoted
14:52:25.040053 git.c:419 trace: built-in: git log '--format=%gd: %gs' -g --first-parent -m refs/stash -- 14:52:26.436274 run-command.c:643 trace: run_command: unset GIT_PAGER_IN_USE; LESS=FRX LV=-c less stash@{0}: On devel: NYFL optimization stash@{1}: On GL285: gl285We can see that the "log" command actually works! The segfaults seem not to derail the command from actually performing its task. So what processes are actually segfaulting? Maybe "strace -o trace.out -f git stash list" would be instructive. You should be able to find the segfaulting process in that trace, and then can grep for that PID to see what it was doing (especially what command was exec'd, and possibly what it was doing right before the segfault). I can also help picking through the strace output if you're comfortable sending it off-list (it's likely to be much too large to send on-list anyway). -Peff