Re: [RFC/PATCH] point pull requesters to Git Git Gadget

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG:

  1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't
     munge timestamps to help threaded mail readers handled out-of-order
     delivery.

Hmph, I had an impression that the recent "why aren't these sorted"
topics were via GGG, not submitGit, though.

We did have one case a few months ago, but I think it was since fixed.

Whereas it cannot be fixed for submitGit without major re-architecting,
because the mails go out through Amazon SES, which writes its own
timestamp.

I could be wrong about GGG being fixed though. I haven't noticed the
problem lately, but we definitely had a submitGit-related one a few
weeks ago.

Yeah, I was confused; [ref]
was about submitGit, but somehow I thought the sender switched to,
and the out-of-order thread was sent via, GGG.  My mistake.