Re: [PATCH 0/6] getenv() timing fixes
From: Stefan Beller <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-15 19:38:58
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:32 AM Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 10:51:42AM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote:quoted
quoted
I wonder, and not as "you should do this" feedback on this series, justThere is a getenv_safe() in environment.c, but I guess a xgetenv() that takes the same parameters as getenv() is better for ease of use.Yes, but it punts on the memory ownership by stuffing everything into an argv_array. That saves a few lines if you're going to ask for five variables, but for a single variable it's no better than: char *foo = getenv_safe("FOO");You meant xstrdup_or_null(getenv("FOO")) here? And did Stefan mean #define xgetenv(e) xstrdup_or_null(getenv(e)) ?
Assume I did. (I thought of it as a function effectively adding the xstrdup_or_null) If we go further into assuming the usage patterns of these xgetenv calls, we might throw in an UNLEAK as well, but that might be over board.