Re: Gitignore documentation

Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:

https://public-inbox.org/git/20111107080926.GC30486@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net/

Any idea what happened there?  Would it be useful for me to rebase
and revive that series?

No idea what happend there.

Anyway, I quickly read them over and found nothing questionable,
except perhaps the moving of "slash is dropped for the purpose of
the remaining rules" in 1/4 were probably not a great idea (IOW, I
found that it leaves a stronger impression to the readers to say it
upfront in the paragraph), but I do not think it is a show-stopper.

Reviving the topic would indeed be a good idea.

Thanks.