Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Reimplement rebase --merge via interactive machinery
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-07 19:46:27
Elijah Newren [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 8:11 AM Elijah Newren [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This series continues the work of making rebase more self-consistent by removing inconsistencies between different backends. In particular, this series focuses on making the merge machinery behave like the interactive machinery (though a few differences between the am and interactive backends are also fixed along the way), and ultimately removes the merge backend in favor of reimplementing the relevant options on top of the interactive machinery.Friendly ping...let me know if you want me to simply resend v4.
If you have anything newer than 90673135 ("rebase: Implement --merge
via the interactive machinery", 2018-12-11), then yeah, I haven't
seen it.
Thanks.
P.S. even if that one is latest, I would need to downcase Implement
before it hits 'next' ;-)
quoted
Differences since v3 (full range-diff below): - Fixed the redundant "fatal: error:" error message prefixes, as pointed out by Duy - Rebased on 2.20.0 Elijah Newren (8): rebase: make builtin and legacy script error messages the same rebase: fix incompatible options error message t5407: add a test demonstrating how interactive handles --skip differently am, rebase--merge: do not overlook --skip'ed commits with post-rewrite git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the interactive machinery git-legacy-rebase: simplify unnecessary triply-nested if rebase: define linearization ordering and enforce it rebase: Implement --merge via the interactive machinery...