Re: [PATCH on master v2] revision: use commit graph in get_reference()
From: Derrick Stolee <hidden>
Date: 2018-12-13 16:20:22
On 12/12/2018 8:27 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:58:12AM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:quoted
quoted
Yeah, this was the part that took me a bit to figure out, as well. The optimization here is really just avoiding a call to lookup_commit(), which will do a single hash-table lookup. I wonder if that's actually worth this more complex interface (as opposed to just always taking an oid and then always returning a "struct commit", which could be old or new).Avoidance of lookup_commit() is more important than an optimization, I think. Here, we call lookup_commit() only when we know that that object is a commit (by its presence in a commit graph). If we just called it blindly, we might mistakenly create a commit for that hash when it is actually an object of another type. (We could inline lookup_commit() in parse_commit_in_graph_one(), removing the object creation part, but that adds complexity as well.)I was thinking we would only do so in the happy path when we find a commit. I.e., something like: obj = lookup_object(oid); /* does not auto-vivify */ if (obj && obj->parsed) return obj; if (we_have_it_in_commit_graph) { commit = obj || lookup_commit(oid); fill_in_details_from_commit_graph(commit); return &commit->obj; } else { return parse_object(oid); } which is more along the lines of that parse_probably_commit() that Stolee mentioned.
This approach is what I had in mind. Thanks for making it more concrete! -Stolee