Re: Retrieving a file in git that was deleted and committed
From: Bryan Turner <hidden>
Date: 2018-12-07 07:37:50
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:26 PM Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:07:00PM -0800, biswaranjan panda wrote:quoted
Thanks! Strangely git log --follow does work.I suspect it would work even without --follow. When you limit a log traversal with a pathspec, like: git log foo that is not about following some continuous stream of content, but rather just applying that pathspec to the diff of each commit, and pruning ones where it did not change. So even if there are gaps where the file did not exist, we continue to apply the pathspec to the older commits.
Ah, of course. Thanks for the clarification, Jeff. And my apologies to Biswaranjan Panda for the incorrect information.
Tools like git-blame will _not_ work, though, as they really are trying to track the content as they walk back through history. And Once all of the content seems to appear from nowhere in your new commit, that seems like a dead end. In theory there could be some machine-readable annotation in the commit object (or in a note created after the fact) to say "even though 'foo' is a new file here, it came from $commit:foo". And then git-blame could keep following the content there. But such a feature does not yet exist. -Peff