Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 4 authors, 2018-11-13

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] remote.c: add braces in anticipation of a follow-up change

From: Stefan Beller <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-26 21:05:26

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:27 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
[off-list ref] wrote:
The CodingGuidelines say "When there are multiple arms to a
conditional and some of them require braces, enclose even a single
line block in braces for consistency.". Fix the code in
match_explicit() to conform.
A tangent from a bystander:

This sounds like a lovely transformation that we'd want to
apply to the whole tree (Who wouldn't want to conform to
our self-imposed coding guidelines?),
so I tried coming up with a coccinelle patch to do that,
but I did not manage to produce such a patch, yet.
So far I am at

@@
expression E1;
statement S1, S2;
@@
 {<...
 if (E1) {
   S1;
-} else
+} else {
  S2;
+}
 ...>}

but this doesn't transform the simple test program that I wrote.
While I'm at it change the if/else if/else in guess_ref() to use
braces. This is not currently needed, but a follow-up change will add
a new multi-line condition to that logic.
The patch looks good.

Stefan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help