Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] remote.c: add braces in anticipation of a follow-up change
From: Stefan Beller <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-26 21:05:26
From: Stefan Beller <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-26 21:05:26
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:27 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] wrote:
The CodingGuidelines say "When there are multiple arms to a conditional and some of them require braces, enclose even a single line block in braces for consistency.". Fix the code in match_explicit() to conform.
A tangent from a bystander:
This sounds like a lovely transformation that we'd want to
apply to the whole tree (Who wouldn't want to conform to
our self-imposed coding guidelines?),
so I tried coming up with a coccinelle patch to do that,
but I did not manage to produce such a patch, yet.
So far I am at
@@
expression E1;
statement S1, S2;
@@
{<...
if (E1) {
S1;
-} else
+} else {
S2;
+}
...>}
but this doesn't transform the simple test program that I wrote.
While I'm at it change the if/else if/else in guess_ref() to use braces. This is not currently needed, but a follow-up change will add a new multi-line condition to that logic.
The patch looks good. Stefan