"brian m. carlson" [off-list ref] writes:
Yeah, that behavior is quite old. I'm surprised that Linux ever did
that.
...
I don't feel strongly either way. I feel confident the rest of Git
doesn't use that field, so I don't see any downsides to keeping it other
than the slight overhead of populating it. I just thought I'd ask in
case there was something important I was missing.
OK, I'd consider that this part of the review settled for taking the
patch as-is. Let's mark the topic for merging to 'next' soonish in
the what's cooking report.
Thanks.