Michał Górny [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Very minor point but by not using pre-increment, i.e.
if (seen_exclusive_status++)
goto found_duplicate_status;
you can use the expression as a "have we already seen?" boolean,
whic may probably be more idiomatic.
The patch is good in the way written as-is, and this is so minor
that it is not worth rerolling to only update this part.
Sure, thanks. For the record, I've been taught to use pre-increment
whenever possible to avoid copying the variable but I suppose it doesn't
really matter here. Just a habit.
Yes, it's a habit many C++ trained people spread; it just looks
weird to see a pre-increment of a "have we done this once?" variable
and end up comparing to see if it is strictly greater than 1
(i.e. have we reached 2 or more?).