On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 12:01 AM Elijah Newren [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 7:41 AM Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
v5 fixes some minor comments from round 4 and a big mistake in 5/5.
Junio's scary feeling turns out true. There is a missing invalidation
in keep_entry() which is not added in 6/7. 7/7 makes sure that similar
I'm having trouble parsing this. Did you mean "...which is now
added..."?
Oops. Yes.
Also, if 6/7 represents a fix to the "big mistake in 5/5",
why is 6/7 separate from 5/7 instead of squashed in?
I felt that was cramming up too much in the commit message. But if
it's the right thing to do, I'll reroll and combine 5/7 and 6/7 .
--
Duy