Re: [PATCH] gpg-interface.c: detect and reject multiple signatures on commits
From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-17 06:54:49
Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 14:31 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
quoted
It's not clear to me that the name is_status or SIGNATURE_STATUS captures what this field represents. Aren't these all sigcheck statuses? Can you describe briefly what distinguishes the cases where this should be 0 versus 1?
[...]
Maybe it should be EXCLUSIVE_STATUS or something like that, to distinguish from things that can occur simultaneously to them.
Thanks. Makes sense. [...]
quoted
Can we have a test to make sure this behavior doesn't regress? See t/README for an overview of the test framework and "git grep -e gpg t/" for some examples.Will try. Do I presume correctly that I should include the commit object with the double signature instead of hacking git to construct it? ;-)
Good question. You can hack away with a new program in t/helper/, or you can make your test do object manipulation with "git cat-file commit <object>" and "git hash-object -t commit -w --stdin". If you run into trouble, just let the list know and I'm happy to try to help. (Or if you would like real-time help, I'm usually in #git-devel on freenode.) Jonathan