Re: [PATCH 0/9] Add missing includes and forward declares

Elijah Newren [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

But please remind me not to merge this round down to 'next', for the
"enum" forward decl gotcha.

I'll send out a new round shortly.  Would you like me to squash the
last patch (the one that had two hunks with minor conflicts with other
topics in next and pu) into the first patch, or would you rather I
dropped that patch and waited to submit it until later?

Either way is fine, especially if you looked at the intergration
result from yesterday and resolution of these conflicts looked
reasonable to you.