Re: [PATCH 1/1] verify-tag/verify-commit should exit unsuccessfully when signature is not trusted
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-09 14:30:14
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 01:43:02AM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 05:59:43PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
"brian m. carlson" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
FWIW, I'm on board with returning non-zero in any case where gpg would.I think that's probably the best solution overall.FWIW, I am not married to the current behaviour. I would not be surprised if it mostly came by accident and not designed.Since apparently I was the author of the commit that changed the behavior originally, let me simply say that I was not aware that gpg signalled the correctness of a signature by its exit status when I wrote that patch. If I had known that, I would have deferred to gpg in my change. My goal was consistency between verify-tag and verify-commit, and in retrospect I probably made the wrong decision.
OK, so it seems like we're all in agreement now. What next? There was a patch at the start of this thread, but it specifically checks for "sigc->result == U". That's probably OK, since I think it restores the behavior in earlier versions of Git. But I wonder if we should simply be storing the fact that gpg exited non-zero and relaying that. That would fix this problem and truly make the rule "if gpg reported an error, we propagate that". -Peff