Re: [PATCH 0/2] negotiator: improve recent behavior + docs
From: Jonathan Tan <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-01 20:25:51
I think 01/02 in this patch series implements something that's better & more future-proof.
Thanks. Both patches are: Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <redacted> A small note:
- packfile; any other value instructs Git to use the default algorithm + packfile; The default is "default" which instructs Git to use the default algorithm
I think we generally don't capitalize words after semicolons. Thanks for noticing that the check of fetch.negotiationAlgorithm only happens when a negotiation actually occurs - before your patches, it didn't really matter because we tolerated anything, but now we do. I think this is fine - as far as I know, Git commands generally only read the configs relevant to them, and if fetch.negotiationAlgorithm is not relevant in a certain situation, we don't need to read it.
That's awesome. This is exactly what I wanted, this patch series also fixes another small issue in 02/02; which is that the docs for the two really should cross-link to make these discoverable from one another.
That's a good idea; thanks for doing it.
I.e. the way I'm doing this is I add all the remotes first, then I
fetch them all in parallel, but because the first time around I don't
have anything for that remote (and they don't share any commits) I
need to fake it up and pretend to be fetching from a repo that has
just one commit.
It would be better if I could somehow say that I don't mind that the
ref doesn't exist, but currently you either error out with this, or
ignore the glob, depending on the mode.
So I want this, but can't think of a less shitty UI than:
git fetch --negotiation-tip=$REF --negotiation-tip-error-handling=missing-ref-means-no-want
Or something equally atrocious, do you have any better ideas?If you wanted to do this, it seems better to me to just declare a "null" negotiation algorithm that does not perform any negotiation at all.