Re: [PATCH 3/3] gc: do not return error for prior errors in daemonized mode
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-18 17:22:28
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 09:21:18AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
I still think that "repo" should probably stop respecting the exit code. But that's no excuse for Git not to have a sensible exit code in the first place.I am not yet convinced that this last step to exit with 0 is a good change, even though I can understand that it would be more convenient, as there currently is no easy way for the calling script to tell two error cases apart. I think the "sensible exit code" you mention would be something like "1 for hard error, 2 for 'I am punting as I see there were previous errors---you may want to examine your repository'". If we did that from day one and documented that behaviour, nobody would have complained, but adopting that suddenly is of course a breaking change. Perhaps we should exit with 2 (not 0) in that "previous error" case by default, and then have a configuration knob to turn that 2 into 0 for those who cannot easily modify the calling script? That way, we by default will *not* break those who have been paying attention to zero-ness of the exit status, we allow those who want to treat this "prior error" case as if there were no error with just a knob, and then those who are willing to update their script can tell two cases by the exit status and act differently.
I think we have been exiting non-zero with "previous errors" for some time with the daemonizing code. It was just spelled "-1" instead of "2". So just jumping right there does not mean any regression from the current state, I don't think (but it also does not fix existing scripts like "repo" that check the code). I agree the config you suggest would give people the tools to make that case work. But it somehow rubs me the wrong way. Can you imagine the perspective of a user who is told "oh, your script breaks? Just try setting this option to ignore error codes in this one particular situation". It feels like a weird hack, because it is. It's also still inconsistent in the daemonize case. The run that yields the error won't return a non-zero exit. But the next run will exit with "2". -Peff